Using a single test-score cutoff as the criteria is common but not considered best practice. Even nonverbal tasks like puzzles are influenced by class and cultural background. IQ and other standardized tests produce results that can be skewed by background cultural knowledge, language learner status and racial and social privilege. Tests have their problems, too, says Kaufman. Research shows that screening every child, rather than relying on nominations, produces far more equitable outcomes. Pre-service teachers, says Peters, typically get one day of training on gifted students, which may not prepare them to recognize giftedness in its many forms. Less-educated or non-English-speaking parents may not be aware of gifted program opportunities. Minority and free-reduced lunch students are extremely underrepresented in gifted programs nationwide. The most common answer nationwide is: First, by teacher and/or parent nomination. In a school where most children are in remediation, he argues, a child who is simply performing on grade level may need special attention. He says the question that every teacher and every school should be asking is, "How will we serve the students who already know what I'm covering today?" He's a professor of education at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater who prepares teachers for gifted certifications. By her lights, the population we should be focusing on is the top 2.5 percent to 3 percent of achievers, not the top 5 to 10 percent. GIFTED TEST FULLSilverman argues that just as children with IQ scores two full standard deviations below the norm need special classrooms and extra resources, those who score two standard deviations above the norm need the same. It can be useful for education policy purposes to think about giftedness as it relates to the rest of the special education spectrum. How many students should be designated gifted? Things like: "Has a vivid imagination." "Good sense of humor." "Highly sensitive."ġ(a). Some centers for gifted children put out checklists of "giftedness" so broad that any proud parent would be hard-pressed not to recognize her child. Of course, as the definitions get broader, the measurements get more subjective and thus, perhaps, less useful. Our country has a narrow view of what counts as merit." "That's a really important finding that is just totally ignored. "There's research that these other things like motivation and grit can take you to the same exact academic outcomes as someone with a higher IQ but without those things," says Scott Barry Kaufman, a psychologist who studies intelligence and creativity at the University of Pennsylvania and the author of the book Ungifted. Recent intelligence research de-emphasizes IQ alone and focuses on social and emotional factors. "It's like measuring a 6-foot person with a 5-foot ruler," says Linda Silverman, an educational psychologist and founder of the Institute for the Study of Advanced Development. In addition, IQ tests become less useful as children get older because there is less "headroom" on the test, especially for those who are already high scorers. He or she may be brilliant at mathematics but lack background knowledge or impulse control. No 6-year-old is truly mentally identical to a 12-year-old. Scores are indexed to age, with 100 as the average a 6 year old who gives answers characteristic of a 12 year old would have an IQ of 200.īut there are problems with this framework. This concept matches the most popular tests of giftedness: IQ tests. One of the most popular definitions, dating to the early 1990s, is "asynchronous development." That means, roughly, a student whose mental capacities develop ahead of chronological age. Skip A Grade? Start Kindergarten Early? It's Not So Easy
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |